not that mr. hunter hasn't been a cunt before, but hahaha oh wow

[mc776]

OH NOES OUR MORRULZ R GON CANADA IS NAZI ATHEIST KILLER DEATH LAND ONONO NO A BLOO BLOO BLOO BLOO BLOO

Amazingly, the comments are even worse. Like, YouTube worse. Here's a rather disturbing look into the creationist, patriarchal, is-ist* and just plain creepy mindset the anti-death zombies think in:

...

Regarding your second paragraph, who forces an unwanted pregnancy on anyone? Yes, I know, rapists do, but their children account for very few of the abortions induced. Don't Canadian women realize the purpose of specialized female anatomy? Don't they understand the complementary male anatomy? Motherhood is a responsibility, and there is such a thing as child abuse.

...

Every child a wanted child, and every mother a willing mother.

Because, of course, the state can always legislate someone into wanting and willing something.


*Which I've since narrowed down to the basic act of taking a category and fetishizing it as inviolate and sacrosanct - a bit of an anticlimax, I know.


EDIT: Link unrelated

Comments

[furikku.livejournal.com]

I am too tired and this argument hurts far too much for me to try to take any of it in.

I really hate the idea that a woman does not own herself even after she is legally old enough to do so. (Whether or not she is married!)

Also, it looks like he is trying to relate things that are not exactly related.

I think the troll decision sounds the best, though I am saddened to think that he probably DOES espouse that view. -_-

[vaecrius.livejournal.com]

I am too tired and this argument hurts far too much for me to try to take any of it in.

See my reply below. The only relevant argument is that there's also the fetus's interest to consider in addition to the woman's.

The rest is just supporting cultural context, but of the very sort of culture that no one in their right mind would espouse in a UDHR (http://www.un.org/Overview/rights.html)-ratifying state.